Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size default color brick color green color
CAFCOR Forum
_GEN_GOTOBOTTOM Post Reply
TOPIC:
#19109
did VOODOO LEGAL ADVICE trigger VOODOO TOILET REPLACEMENT CLAIM ? Rasmussen v Strata VIS1611 2020/07/17 19:55  
Not legal advice as usual.

Now who could confuse strata duty to insure with owner duty to replace worn out unit components ?

( Maybe plenty of people if they don't or cannot read BC's Strata Property Act and their own governance documents . .)

Owners fail to persuade BC’s CRT Tribunal, to order their strata corp - other owners - to replace their two worn out toilets !

NOR to pay for the $ 438 legal advice they claim they got before bringing the stupid claim forward. Is this a matter for the law society of B.C. ?

Rasmussen v. The Owners, Strata Plan VIS 1611, 2020 BCCRT 768 http://canlii.ca/t/j8l0j
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
_GEN_GOTOTOP Post Reply
contact webmaster