Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size default color brick color green color
did VOODOO LEGAL ADVICE trigger VOODOO TOILET REPLACEMENT CLAIM ? Rasmussen v Strata VIS1611 2020/07/17 19:55  
Not legal advice as usual.

Now who could confuse strata duty to insure with owner duty to replace worn out unit components ?

( Maybe plenty of people if they don't or cannot read BC's Strata Property Act and their own governance documents . .)

Owners fail to persuade BC’s CRT Tribunal, to order their strata corp - other owners - to replace their two worn out toilets !

NOR to pay for the $ 438 legal advice they claim they got before bringing the stupid claim forward. Is this a matter for the law society of B.C. ?

Rasmussen v. The Owners, Strata Plan VIS 1611, 2020 BCCRT 768
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
contact webmaster