Not legal advice.
Imagine an alternative universe in which some sorta White Knight could intervene in condo or Building Scheme governance. ( instead of civil justice system or tribunal )
This ain't it.
An inner city OTTAWA, 76 unit non-condo, residential co-operative community had been - according to a front page Ottawa Citizen article - " . .
. a model of affordable, community-based housing". But in November 2022 it wound up with two rival Boards of Directors disputing each other's legality. And rival property managers and rival lawyers. And paralysis because neither side would compromise nor seek a judicial resolution. Income supplemented housing can be catastrophically compromised in such a scenario, as can be readily grasped by anyone who has ever managed such communities.
At this co-op, given the amount of ongoing income supplement funding and past capital contributions from Ottawa taxpayers,
one would have thought that as overseer "Housing Manager" the City of Ottawa could have lots of "gravitas". That the rival Boards would be amenable to various compromises to avoid operational collapse. Lots of taxpayer bucks at stake. For the disputants to make their own compromise rather than "triggering" an intervention by the taxpayers . . .
The City appointed an interim Board to try to avert disaster and set up remedial resolution with residents.
Instead the remnants of one Board - the pre-November 2022 one - disputed being unseated.
A real biggy : Those remnant Directors - attempting to cling to power on alleged procedural grounds - also refused to surrender to a successor Board nor the City's interim remedial Board, the financial records and computers.
Police were called amidst reported physical confrontations.
In April 2023 the City was forced - "triggered" - to apply to Ontario Superior Court for an Order validating its remedy and ordering four "clinger" Directors to disgorge the computers and records ! Regional Senior ( Superior Court ) Justice Calum MacLeod was thus faced in Superior Court with
three competing Boards !
He underlined that the unseating ( membership vote procedurals ) dispute between the first two rivals was NOT being adjudicated.
1 - He ordered that the City's remedies were declared to be valid and supportable in the serious circumstances.
That's despite "short-notice" to "remedy or else".
2 - Also that the "clinger" Directors MUST disgorge the co-op's financial records and computers to the City's remedial Board.
But at least one of the "clingers" is appealing that Order ! One wonders if the "clingers" have grasped that if their Board was validly unseated in November 2022, then they may have to pick up their own legal bills . . . .
How easy is it then where - as to the integrity of income-supplemented housing - there really is a policing power unlike the universe of condos ?
Ottawa (City) v Fobert et al ( 2023 ) ONSC 3811 issued June 26/23
https://canlii.ca/t/jxvlztop FRONT PAGE print edition Citizen July 27/23
“Three Boards of Directors fought for control of Ottawa Housing Co-op” by Andrew Duffy
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/how-one-sandy-hill-housing-co-op-descended-into-chaos-and-acrimonyHousing Services Act, 2011, SO 2011 https://canlii.ca/t/55qnpNotice, opportunity to rectify and make submission
90 (1) Notice, opportunity to rectify and make submission
Content of notice of triggering event (2)
The notice referred to in clause (1) (a) must,
. . . . (c) specify the period within which the housing provider must comply with the notice, which
may not be less than 60 days from the date the notice is given ; . . .