Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size default color brick color green color
James ()
User Offline
Book Review 2012/03/16 18:56  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
url for the Book Review itself 2012/03/17 12:37  
good digging by James. I wonder what is the url for the review itself ? Does not seem to be the Starr site itself.

One should be very skeptical about any disputant's claims that a particular prohibition - eg pet prohibition - "had been ignored from the beginning." There is a big difference between "As a Board we consistently tried our best with the resources to halt the violation" and "We acquiesced and were lazy or inconsistent". Unilateral claims are frequently self-serving or ignorant falsehoods, no matter who makes them and even if they have ten PhDs.

About acquiescence / laches / illegal tolerance, whatever, it is worth looking at recent
“T.C.E.C.C. No. 1508 v. William Stasyna, 2012 ONSC 1504” issued March 6 2012

That said, concern with illegal revenge or illegal retaliation - NOT "retribution', something sorted out by the Gods or whatever - is one reason why I have stopped trying to persuade my POA to observe the standards of the Occupiers Liability Act, prudent realty management, etc . . . . Many of them already "know" ( ! ) these things ! In any sort of "shared ownership" situation, those who object or even try to help professionally, could face a counter-attack as claimed by this woman . . She has lots of bucks and time on her hands to fight back and sell books about it. Do the rest of us ?
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
contact webmaster