Skip to content

Narrow screen resolution Wide screen resolution Auto adjust screen size Increase font size Decrease font size Default font size default color brick color green color
CAFCOR Forum
_GEN_GOTOBOTTOM Post Reply
TOPIC:
#18942
SECURITY DEPOSITS imposed by condo corp target RENTED UNITS only - Sask by-law upheld not oppressive 2019/03/06 20:34  
FEB 28/19 Canada's S.C.C. Supreme Court refuses appeal by SASKATCHEWAN oppression claimant Robin James Goertz from S.R.L. Self Represented Litigant ( pro se ) losses .

Original Declarant of 41 unit Bare Land Condo in northeast Saskatoon, Mr. Goertz has lost at 3 judicial levels including claiming OPPRESSION against his condo corporation under s 99 (2) of Saskatchewan’s CPA 1993 ch C-26.1

Saskatchewan : LAWFUL CONDO CORP SECURITY DEPOSITS can be by-law IMPOSED onto rented units specifically

Sask Condo law's section 77 allows a Saskatchewan condo corp’s by-lawing to impose without privity for each of Mr. Goertz’s rented units, SECURITY DEPOSITS compulsorily payable to the condo corp & targetting only rented units !

Here the corporation attorned & sued each set of tenants in Small Claims directly, only one paying.

The lawful DEPOSITS - equivalent to a single month’s rental of each unit – secure either prospectively or retroactively master insurance policy deductibles.

Oppression was also also ( unsuccessfully ) alleged for unseating Mr. Goertz from the Board, vote stripping, records refusals, and charge-backs for dog poop. Administratorship was refused.

The S. C. C . refusal : Goertz v Owners Condo Plan # 98SA12401 ( 2019 ) 14406 (SCC) issued Feb 28/19 http://canlii.ca/t/hxrm7


SCC refused appeal from :Goertz v Owners Condo Plan # 98SA12401 (2018) SKCA 41 issued May 29/18 http://canlii.ca/t/hsckq
( with discussions of Oppression Saskatchewan style & Business Judgement rule )
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
_GEN_GOTOTOP Post Reply
contact webmaster